![]() ![]() Check any malfunctioning reports from your users and clear them first.All your queries are not using calculated fields stored from the local tables, if you allow that, the Sql- server will not recognize those control fields, they will just be assigned data type like float, which will distort your reports because nothing will be pulled to your reports by your queries.The reasons why this error occurs is due to the MS Access 2013 we use which is lower than 2016.īefore you go ahead using the above tool, ensure that your application is thoroughly tested or error-free, for example, check the following: Then save all changes, this will sort out the sub-form problems and everything will be back to normal as usual. Go to those queries properties and change the property called all out-put – from No to Yes.Open your record sources for your affected sub-forms: Because in principle you cannot install MS Access run-time 2016 together with the full version 2016, then you still have some teething problems here, your closet candidate will be MS Access run-time 2013, but again be prepared to the read-only or uneditable sub-forms after linking your back- end.Ĭheck sub-form forms with the following symptoms after linking.If by mistake you choose Version 12.0, then rest assured that all your child tables will be rejected and your app will not be linked.To get this version you need to install MS Access run-time 2013. ( 2) If you are migrating an MS Access 2016 ACCDB, then use Microsoft Data Access Object (DAO) provider version 14.0. ( 1) If you are migrating an MDB, then use Microsoft Data Access Object (DAO) provider version 12.0, to get this version you need to install MS Access run-time 2007. To help our novice programmers, please use the following: This is where the first killer punch is! I emphasize, please be sure of which Microsoft Data Access Object (DAO) provider version is suitable for your situation. You can obtain the latest version of SNAC from Microsoft® SQL Server® 2008 R2 Feature Pack The SQL Server Native Access Client (SNAC) version 10.5 and above for migration to SQL Azure.You can install DAO provider from Microsoft Office 2010/2007 product or download it from Microsoft web site. Microsoft Data Access Object (DAO) provider version 12.0 or 14.0.Access to and sufficient permissions on the computer that hosts the target instance of SQL Server/SQL Azure DB to which you will be migrating database objects and data.NET Framework version 4.0 is available on the SQL Server product disc, and by using information in the Microsoft. NET Framework version 4.0 or a later version. Microsoft Windows Installer 3.1 or a later version.Windows 7 or a later version, or Windows Server 2008 or a later version.If you try to run the wrong version, you will see a message warning that you are running the incorrect version of SSMA for the available Access libraries.īefore you install SSMA, make sure that your system meets the following requirements: After you download and install SSMA on a 64-bit version of Windows, you will find two program shortcuts, one for 32-bit Access and the other for 64-bit Access. SSMA is free and can be downloaded from the Microsoft sites. SSMA is a more generic tool than the Upsizing Wizard (Not present in MS Access 2016) and is designed to migrate data from various databases into SQL Server. Due to some challenges, I went through when I was upsizing my MS Access 2016 to SQL Server 2016, I’m now compelled to share my experience to help those who are in the process of starting the said journey above. This happens like that due to some spicing materials or conversations we normally have with our colleagues, well that sounds out of this world to some readers, but it happens. Instead, use the new Microsoft OLE DB Driver for SQL Server (MSOLEDBSQL) which will be updated with the most recent server features."īest guess is they are using that by default for compatibility.Sometimes we find ourselves in a situation where we may want to dive into the SQL Server Ocean after creating a few numbers of tables in MS Access. As to why Microsoft seems to list contradictory information, I am not sure why they post multiple times in that article "SQL Server Native Client OLE DB provider (SQLNCLI) remains deprecated and it is not recommended to use it for new development work. Even if you specify the older provider name, SQLOLEDB, it will be changed to SQLNCLI when persisted to the catalog.". Further on it states "The Microsoft SQL Server Native Client OLE DB provider is the provider that is used with SQL Server if no provider name is specified or if SQL Server is specified as the product name. See:Īnd the table towards the end states that SQL Server (default) uses "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client OLE DB Provider". The official docs from Microsoft state it uses that one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |